Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 04:17

Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
What’s next?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
A closer look at the striking metamorphosis of Tyrese Haliburton - NBA
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Bitcoin fans aren’t all sold on Trump’s meme coin - NBC News
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Thank you.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
China demands sensitive information for rare earth exports, companies warn - Financial Times
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
7-Day No-Sugar High-Protein Anti-Inflammatory Meal Plan, Created by a Dietitian - AOL.com
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
What is every dictators biggest fear?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Does the Hamas charter specifically call for the death of all Jews and the destruction of Israel?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Scientists Just Found the Oldest Barred Spiral Galaxy – And It’s a Monster - SciTechDaily